
In just the past week it was announced that US troops in
West Africa to combat Ebola will begin leaving the slowly normalizing, but
still fraught, nations worst hit by outbreak. Compared with the “worst case”
scenarios laid out in the NY Times and by the CDC, the already massive human
tragedy could have been 100 times worse. Part and parcel to those apocalyptic
scenarios was the spread to, and then within, the US and Europe in metropolitan
cities where containment is made arduous. Except for a few isolated cases, this
threat did not materialize. Still, 10,000 human lives have been lost and the
response was lethargic at best. Had this been a worldwide disease, more easily
transmitted and slow to show symptoms, what would we have done? And could we be doing more to prevent, rather than react to, infectious disease?