Pages

Monday, February 2, 2015

The Importance of Being Offended

Try to remember being told that Santa Claus is fictional. Up until that point, each year, you had taken seriously the tally of your good deeds in hope of a bigger, better, gift-wrapped reward. But now the spell is broken, there was no fat man squeezing down the chimney with Transformers in tow. You’re furious, face red as a beetroot, at being tricked. Now pair this simple truth, your bald-faced anger in the face of contradiction, with the equally evident truth that you carry around many, many more false ideas at the age of 12 (and to this day) than just Santa’s existence.


There is something beautiful about our childhood state of ignorance but it has nothing to do with the fantasies which we are endowed with. Once confronted, however softly, with the true state of affairs we undergo the stages of intellectual progress in an irrevocable way. Yes, we feel anger and probably deny for some time that our cookies and milk were in vain but the mental cogs turn clockwise. Just think of how many adults you know who underwent this startling revelation but STILL believe in Santa Claus? Seriously, let me know if you do, I've got a Pegasus for sale.

Ironically, in adulthood, it is this state of anger at new and wrenching ideas that raises the drawbridge and floods the moat. The first, unavoidable, stage in considering new ideas or modifying old ones puts us in an emergency shutdown. “Offense” is quickly taken and not recognized as the collision of your pre-existing ideas with new, opposing thoughts. Before long the message is doused in anti-inflammatory political correctness so our own insecurity can bathe in its own reflection.
But all this is build-up to the truly weird, mystifying and self-deluding idea I want to address: we are not only “offended” at ideas which oppose our own, but, with enough prickly practice, are “offended” by ideas which could “offend” anyone else. This is truly bizarre and I will prove my point but, first, read that again.

My first example involves the talk show host Bill Maher. If you’re unfamiliar with him I suggest you look up an episode. Every show I’ve seen tackles a controversial topic and brings together opposing views, as any good news show should. The Reverent Al Sharpton often joins the irreverent Salman Rushdie (author of possibly the most “offensive” book ever: the Satanic Verses) for panel discussions. Maher’s views are well known, he is opposed to religious stupidity and argues that Islam, in particular, is a source of strife in the world today.

Following Mr. Maher’s invitation to give the commencement speech at the University of California at Berkeley, it was not only the Islamic student organizations that protested but also the Atheists on campus. Ponder that a moment, Atheist groups which probably draw on Mr. Maher’s criticism of Christianity and other silly beliefs were so “offended” by his views on Islam they refused to hear him speak. Thankfully this idiotic, bizarre allegiance between the overly-religious and irreligious was put down and Mr. Maher spoke on December 22, 2014. See it here. Other intelligent, brilliant speakers like Ayaan Hirsi Ali have not been afforded the same prevailing of common sense and been turned away.

Likewise, following the murder of Charlie Hebdo cartoonists in Paris for “offense caused”, embargos by Muslim-majority countries on Denmark for “offensive” cartoons, the killing of Theo Van Gogh for a film about women in Islam, the 27-year long death threat on author Salman Rushdie (and on and on…), the focus has skimmed past the outrageous behavior of religiously-inspired murder and quickly turned to the backlash on Muslim communities and anti-Muslim (so-called “Islamophobia”) protests.

Let’s consider why this is so unbelievable:
  1. No Muslims have been killed in the protests following any of the above murders or threats. In fact, the only Muslims who did die were involved in protests against the cartoons organized in dozens of supposedly moderate Muslim-majority countries across the world. Clearly European protection of minority communities is not in question so why the undue scrutiny?
  2. Freedom of speech is a pivotal right at the very heart of past European revolutions and been defended to the death from fascists and religious thugs. And yet, when it comes to yet another thuggish religion in the 21st century, suddenly it has been silenced.
  3. An undeniable portion of Muslims around the world hate what is being done in their religion’s name. Those who are willing to speak up, like Maajid Nawaz of the Quilliam foundation, want to reform Islam from the inside by diluting the power of Wahhabi teachings and violent Quranic verses. Who are liberals, atheists and other vicarious offense-takers to stand in the way of a wanted, budding Islamic reformation?
  4. The fallacy of blaming the victim. In MOST cases, as I’ve argued before, it is the cartoonists, the authors and the ex-Muslims speaking or depicting freely that are blamed for their own murders or threats on their lives. These (truly offensive) remarks are often made by other religious leaders (the Catholic Church has a peculiarly honed sense of “offense”, considering religious conversion is a zero-sum game!). I have been told personally that the cartoonists were “asking for it” and seen it stressed that the magazine is racist (when in fact it is a left-leaning, anti-racism publication) as if to justify the murders.

As we were when children, “offense” at mere ideas should never shut down our willingness to entertain new and enthralling thoughts. The defenses we put up against real and imagined contradictions only make us swing to a polar opposite state, as anti-immigrant protests in Europe prove, damaging our global community and robbing the world of our opinions.

Issues like Islamic terrorism, Islamic State and the murder of practitioners of freedom of speech can never be dealt with by a prickly, misinformed sense of pseudo-multicultural pity. Ideas are not people, they can and should be addressed truthfully and insulted if based on incredulous lies. There is no harm in insulting an idea, nobody gets hurt and we are all free to respond with ideas of our own.


P.S. No Santa believers were intentionally offended by these views. If “offended” please call the national UFO, Yeti and Easter Bunny helpline: 1-800-BULL-SHIT.


Citation:
Santa image. http://www.search-best-cartoon.com/cartoon-santa/cartoon-santa-00.jpg

8 comments:

  1. Great article Ziggy. We really need to empty our emotional side while discussing these issues. Pure rationality unhindered by any emotion is the only way to truly understand these problems.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. My bothers Ziggy and Pankaj I respectively disagree.
    When the goal is to change human thinking then we must keep a holistic view of the mind. Science has shown we have two hemispheres in the human mind that control the mode of human thinking.

    “That of the left brain is verbal and analytic, while right brain thought processes are rapid, complex, whole-pattern, spatial, and specialized for visualimagery and musical ability. The right temporal lobe, in particular, governs visual and auditory imagery. People in whom this area is damaged have difficulty recognizing familiar melodies, faces, and pictures, and learning to identify new ones. The right brain hemisphere also appears to have special links to emotion. Right-brain damage interferes with both the ability to produce and interpret expressions of emotion. Damage to the front part of the right-brain hemisphere renders people unable to act on or express strong emotions. If the damage is further back in the brain, the person can express emotion but not recognize it in other people or in pictures.
    Other general characteristics of right-brain thought processes include the tendency to synthesize rather than analyze, and to relate to things in a concrete rather than a symbolic fashion. Where left-brain thinking tends to represent wholes by abstraction (using one piece of information to represent something larger), the right brain is more likely to interpret data through analogies รณ —seeing relationships between wholes. Right-brain functioning is nontemporal, nonrational, holistic, and intuitive, relying on leaps of insight, hunches, or visual images.”

    Ideas are people. Ideas are a individual thoughts. The thought process a individual has determines many of the actions in ones life. Everyone has a complete different set of prior events in ones life. Which leads people to interpret communication differently. When thoughts are addressed people often get hurt. Wether they should be hurt or not is irrelevant. When attempting to influence it is important to keep a balance approach between the two modes of thought in order to be most effective. Both hemispheres are equally important, just on opposite ends of the spectrum. We can not be dogmatic on one end and say there only one spiritual path or on the opposite end completely focus on the left hemisphere. Balance is the key.
    Even when we look at humans it is important to keep a holistic view in in mind. A important aspect to being a human is spirituality. We can’t completely ignore this part of humanity. Spirituality most important role throughout the years has been tying us humans together by providing us a holistic approach.
    “Right-brain functioning is nontemporal, nonrational, holistic, and intuitive, relying on leaps of insight, hunches, or visual images.”
    Spirituality is part of what makes us human. I disagree with attacking islam because it would be confusing for many people to see the difference in spirituality and Islam. I think what is important is promote our own 21st century values to discredit the values of ancient history.

    Citation: Right-Brain Hemisphere - Left, Hemispheres, People, and Split - JRank Articles http://psychology.jrank.org/pages/545/Right-Brain-Hemisphere.html#ixzz3QgFpEyzu

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anthony

      I am truly happy that you are discussing this issue with us. Not many people recognize the importance of these kinds of discussions.

      You misunderstand our position. If you look at my comment, I said, " Pure rationality unhindered by any emotion is the only way to truly understand these problems." I am not talking about "thought process of an individual" which as you correctly point is interplay of both hemispheres of the brain. I strictly refer to the truth. Pursue of truth only requires rationality. For example, if we are trying to determine how long light takes to reach the Earth from Sun, we only need a rational approach. There is no role of emotions there. I believe that everything in the universe, at the most fundamental level, is a result of basic scientific facts, including our moral values and belief system.

      You said,

      “I disagree with attacking islam because it would be confusing for many people to see the difference in spirituality and Islam. I think what is important is promote our own 21st century values to discredit the values of ancient history.”

      It would be great if promoting 21st century values discredit the values of ancient religions. However, it clearly hasn’t worked in a significant proportion of religious people, including Muslims, Christians and Hindus. Religion seems to have really strong hold on people. There are brilliant scientists like Francis Collins who still believe Jesus is the only way to go to heaven. Similarly, there are countless Muslims and Christians who are quite educated and very rational in every other sphere of life and still believe that gay marriage shouldn’t be allowed. Religion creates a cognitive dissonance in people and makes them able to hold two contradictory beliefs at the same time. The only way to solve this issue is to challenge irrational beliefs. Hence it is very important to question irrational tenets of all religions including Islam.

      Delete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  7. My other arguments concerning the right and left hemisphere is longer agreed upon in the scientific community according to 2013 study by PHD Jeff Anderson. So what I am left with at the moment is my own experience concerning spirituality. Hopefully this will provide some insight as to were my opinions are coming from.
    Religions teach people about, Love, Patience, Kindness, Love, Generosity, and Compassion. Most Religions state the existence of a higher power that commands these principals. Without being commanded to develop these qualities by a religion, as agnostic I found no reason to develop patience. Concerning compassion, love, generosity well I only had these for my friends and family. I did value kindness to others when I wasn’t frustrated or angry at them. However it became a pretty cold frustrating world with a lot of anger directed at the world outside my family and friends. Religion never appealed to me especially the dogmatic ones that said it was there way, and everyone else was wrong. It wasn’t until I read psychiatrist Judith Orloff book emotional freedom that I learned the importance of the above qualities’ have to admit I was surprised to realize religions were not all together wrong. In fact practicing and developing these qualities greatly improved the quality of my life. I was for the first time living in the present moment not living in my head which I was completely focused on the past and future for many years. The book taught me that compassion dissolves anger, Patience dissolved frustration, Loving the world around me increased my own self esteem. This taught me negative emotions don’t have any place in my life and they only bring me misery. Negativity breeds negativity. Misery breeds misery.
    Most all religions teach these basic principles the problem for me is most of them ask you to believe in a supreme being. My Creative part of my brain must be lower than the rest of the population. Lucky for me Buddhism teaches all these principals without having to believe in a supreme being. When I partake in this spiritual practice of meditation and gathering with my community I honestly set on the floor in tears seeing the genuine humanity of those around me and being in the present moment after such a long duration of living within my head. I feel like a void has been filled. I practice spirituality without the believe in a higher power but I wouldn’t be able to meditate and spiritually connect with others without holding those values above that I talked about. It does take seeing the basic goodness in everyone. And develop love and compassion for all. I realize the importance of living my life to the best I can in harmony with others so I personally cannot justify being critical of others religions. I finally understand the importance of spirituality and understand what others have always told me about now. I really see all the religions in the world as a different path to the human need for spirituality, whatever the reason may possibly be. Spirituality is an important aspect to being a human and we should work to eliminate the negatives tied to it while keeping all the positives it provides. Another words is “don’t throw out the baby with the bath water”. Being Irrational is okay and is a creative way for humans to experience spirituality as long as they don’t use it to cause harm to others.

    ReplyDelete